Back to top


Técnica Administrativa - Scientific Journal


Ficha del artículo

Tipo: Research article

Título

Industrial SME´s management benchmarking in Argentina´s northwestern: a multidimensional approach by specifics indexes definition

Industrial SME´s management benchmarking in Argentina´s northwestern: a multidimensional approach by specifics indexes definition

Autoría

Rodríguez Rey, Julio César ⓘ

Resumen

Abstract

A common problem treated in the literature is to know how the firm configures itself according with its competitive and regional environment. These configuration variables can result diffuse and difficult to interpret. In this article a panel of SMEs belonging to four industrial sectors is analyzed: Metal Mechanic, Construction related industries, food industries and large industries.The large industries group is defined as parameter to carry out the benchmarking analysis. In the present work and by media of four indexes definition, related with competitive attitude, process management, production skills and resources costs management, the SMEs panel is descripted and the firms classified. Anbenchmarking analysis is performed in order to visualize the similarities and differences inter-sector in these subjects. The surveys are carried out by the “Maturity grid approach” and statistical analysis are performed to assure the validity of conclusions. The main results of this work shows that metal-mechanic sector perform better than others in all indexes with exception of cost management. Food sector reveals the better performance in cost management, but the competitive attitude is one of the lowest in the panel. All SMEs sectors perform with important differences to large industries panel, but for the cost management index. The main conclusions of this work reveal that there are important differences about firm’s management along the researched sectors. Having in mind the different environments in whichthese firms developed, the “configuration” phenomena manifest in the firms and in the groups, specially marking the differences of the metalwork panel and large industries panel. This kind of research is not evidenced in the literature. In the industry of Tucumán regions no other works of this characteristic was found.

Palabras Clave: , ,

Keyword: Industrial engineering , Industrial SMEs management , Benchmarking

Bibliografía

Assielou, G., Morel, L., y Boly, V. (2002). Evaluation of companie s innovation process. Nancy, Lorraine, France: ERPI-Innovatifs Processes Research Team-Nancy.

Bierly III, P., y Daly, P. (2007). Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Volume 31, Issue 4,.

Bruera, I. (2011). Las PyMES en la economía argentina. Presente, perspectivas y condiciones necesarias para su crecimiento y rentabilidad.INSECAP - UCES.

Chennell, A., Dransfield, S., y Field , J. (2000). OPM® A SYSTEM FOR ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURENMENT. University of Cambridge, 19-21.

Delisle, S., y St-Pierre, J. (2006). An Expert Diagnosis System for benchmarking SMEs performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 13 Iss: 1/2, pp.106 - 119.

Deloitte. (2011). Informe Sectorial de Consumo Masivo en Argentina Un crecimiento sostenido.

Farinelli, S., y Piñero, J. (2005). Sistemas locales de innovación: Las empresas Pymes matalúrgicas de Tandil. Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro.

Fundación Observatorio Pymes. (2010). Informe especial: Competitividad empresarial, desarrollo organizativo y gestión comercial de las PyME industriales. Buenos Aires: Fundación Observatorio Pymes.

Garcia, F., Marchetta, M., Morel, L., Camargo , M., y Forradellas, R. (2012). A framework for measuring logistics performance in the wine industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 284-298.

Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., y Bitit, U. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews , Volume 7 Issue 1 pp. 25–47.

González, J., Camargo, M., Nemery, P., y Sepúlveda, J. (2010). Enhancing firms innovation capabilities through the innovation metrics.

Guan, J., Richard , C., y Kam Mok , Y. (2006). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research 170, 971–986.

Herzog, N., Tonchia, S., y Polajnar, A. (2009). Linkages between manufacturing strategy, benchmarking, performancemeasurement and business process reengineering. Computers y Industrial Engineering, 963-975.

Hsu, C.-C. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making sensnse of concensus. Practical Assessment, 1-8.

Hurmelinna, P., Peltola, S., Tuimala, J., y Virolainen, V.-M. (2002). Attaining world-class RyD by benchmarking buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Production Economics , 39-47.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INDEC). (2010-2011). Informe de evolución del sector de la construcción. Ciudad autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ministerio de economía de la Nación - República Argentina.

Kee, D. M. (2012). Development of Intangible Factors for SME Success in a Developing Country. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 198-213.

Maier, A., Moultrie, J., y Clarkso, P. (2012). Assessing Organizational Capabilities: Reviewing and Guiding the Development of Maturity Grids. TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL. 59, NO. 1.

Meunier, A. (2007). PME: Les stretegiés de succes. Paris: Dunod.

Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo de Tucumán. (2012). Tucumán, polo de inversión productivo. San Miguel de Tucumán: Gobierno de Tucumán.

Ministerio de economía y finanzas públicas de Tucumán. (2013). Plan de competitividad del conglomerado metal mecánico de Tucumán. Buenos Aires - Argentina: SECRETARÍA DE POLÍTICA ECONÓMICA Y PLANIFICACION DEL DESARROLLO.

Morel, L., Camargo, M., y Boly, V. (2012). Mesure de las Capacites a Innover PMI/PME. En Le grand Livre de l`Economie PME (págs. 123-145). Paris: Gualino.

Norte Grande - Programa de competitividad. (2011). Plan de competitividad para Conglomerado (COP) Metalmecánico de Tucumán. San Miguel de Tucumán: Norte Grande.

O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A., y Gallear, D. (2006). In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs. Tecnovation - Elsevier, 30-41.

OECD. (2010). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. OECD Publishing.

Radnor, Z., y Robinson, J. (2000). report, Benchmarking Innovation: A short. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 3-13.

Robert, V., Pereira, M., Kataishi, R., y Yoguel, G. (2012). The effects of feedbacks on firms’ productivity growth. Micro, macro and meso determinants of productivity growth in Argentinian firms. Universidad General Sarmiento.

Rocha Kachba, Y., Souza Plath, A., Gomes Gitirana Ferreira, M., y Forcellini, F. (2012). Alignment of Quality Management in SMEs with the Market Performance. Journal of Technology Management y Innovation, 103-111.

Rodriguez Rey, J., Boly, V., Morel, L., y Forradellas, R. (2012). Performance assets in argentinean industrial SMEs: A two-sector comparison. Ciencia y Técnica Administrativa.

Rodriguez Rey, J., Boly, V., Morel, L., Camargo, M., y Forradellas , R. (2012). Innovation and growth in Argentinian SMEs: A key factors review. Ciencia y Técnica Administrativa.

Rosenbusch , N., Brinckmann, J., y Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing , Vol 26 pp 441–457.

Ruggirello, H. M. (2011). El Sector de la Construcción en perspectiva Internacionalización e impacto en el mercado de trabajo. Aulas y Andamios.

SAGPyA, D. d. (2006). Industria Alimentaria Argentina - Análisis del sector. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: SUBSECRETARIA DE POLÍTICA AGROPECUARIA Y ALIMENTOS.

Salles, M. (2006). Stratégies des PME el intelligence économique.ECONOMICA.

Sánchez, A., Lago , A., Ferràs , X., y Ribera, J. (2011). Innovation Management Practices, Strategic Adaptation, and Business Results: Evidence from the Electronics Industry. Journal of Technology management and innovation, 14-39.

Taticchi, P., Balachandran, K., Botarelli, M., y Cagnazzo, L. (2008). Performance measurent management for small and medium enterprises: An integrated approach. JAMAR, Vol. 6 · No. 2.

Yoguel, G., y Moori-Koenig, V. (2000). Los problemas del entorno de negocios. Desarrollo competitivo de las PyMEs Argentinas. Buenos Aires: Fundes.

Zairi , M., y Jarrar, Y. (2010). Future Trends in Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage: A Global Survey.Bradford: European centre of best practices management.


Journal: Técnica Administrativa - ISSN: 1666-1680

Volume: 13, Number: 2, Order: 1; ISSUE: 58

Date of publisher: 2014-04-15

URL: www.cyta.com.ar/ta/article.php?id=130201

License: Atribución 4.0 - Internacional (CC BY 4.0) / © Ciencia y Técnica Administrativa

Registro ISSN:1666-1680

Cita del artículo

Rodríguez Rey, Julio César; ; (2014). Industrial SME´s management benchmarking in Argentina´s northwestern: a multidimensional approach by specifics indexes definition. Técnica Administrativa. 13(2), 1. http://www.cyta.com.ar/ta/article.php?id=130201


Google Scholar Index

Article

Industrial SME´s management benchmarking in Argentina´s northwestern: a multidimensional approach by specifics indexes definition

Publisher:

Ciencia y Técnica Administrativa - CyTA


To send article, send it to the email: editorialcyta@gmail.com

Identify it, in the subject field, with the word: Article

In the body of the email, indicate the following information for each of the authors, name to be quoted, filiation, and email